Where two deeper

Will develop and simplify the situation - the company was a client-server database system on X, they hire a new programmer who believes that X - garbage, and nothing but, say, Cache database or a Y, not save the Russian revolution.

And from that moment and start issues common to all.
a) Is determined by the business requirements to the points that are not satisfied with the current system?.
a) Who evaluates the cost of processing system in comparison with the previous refinement?.

My options are -.
a) not defined. Itching is caused by the need to move a new programmer - or a purely scientific itch or desire elementary podsidet head as retrograde. Moreover, business in general there are no requirements, and conduct a survey of leadership will not allow the toad, so the only argument - ' we will stay away '.

b) Evaluates a new programmer, with a confident estimation error of time and resources in order for the worse. Those who stand for the revision of the old system, will automatically be treated as a retrograde lazy, compromised to the same hereditary mistakes and ...

Of course, the idea of ​​consulting services to attract, develop recommendations for growing cacti. But - welcome to the real world, Homer.

Here are my thoughts about the course of the evolution of IT in the corporate world, small and mid-level - they rule the programmers as they want where they want and simultaneously prepare the ground for the purchase of SAP. We discuss?.